Every article submitted to our journal is subjected to the preliminary quality check by plagscan. If the article meets the preliminary quality test then we proceed for the peer-review process by assigning editor and reviewers.

1) If we receive the accept comments from the editor and reviewers then we proceed for the galley proof then publish the article online.

2) If we receive the revised comments from the editor and reviewers then we forward comment to the author to make necessary changes.

3) If we receive the reject comments from the editor and reviewers then we reject the article.

Flowchart of Review Process:

Magnus Med Club is an open-access format, authors of accepted papers are given the option of paying a minimum handling fee to make their paper freely available online immediately via the journal website, that readers will not need a journal subscription to view open access content. Right from preliminary quality check to pdf online, we need a minimum amount of workforce. This is supported by publication fee. The costs associated with producing print issues are not included.

The publication charges for all the journals are USD 520.

For all type of articles, publication charge will be the same excluding commentary, letter to the editor and editorial articles.

Plagiarism is the use of others' published and unpublished ideas or words without attribution or permission, and presenting them as new and original rather than derived from an existing source. The intent and effect of plagiarism are to mislead the reader as to the contributions of the plagiarizer.

We only accept original content from authors, which means that their work should not be under review by other publications. We use the Plagscan software to detect instances of overlapping and similar text matches in submitted articles.

The similarity of the content used by the authors should not be more than 25% and if the content used from others work then it should be correctly cited. Ask author to enclose signed authorship statement or cover letter stating that work is original/the author’s own and documentary evidence.

Our journal provides quick and free access to content online. Open Access has become an important way to make research findings freely available for anyone to access and view.

Open Access is a publication model where neither readers nor a reader's institution are charged for access to articles or other resources. All articles published by Magnus Med Club are made immediately available worldwide under an open-access license. Everyone has free, unlimited access and free to re-use the published material if proper accreditation/citation of the original publication.

Open Access publishing, therefore, leads to wider dissemination of information and increased efficiency in research fields. Magnus Med Club is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

You are free to:

• Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

• Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Magnus Med Club follows the publication principles of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The guidelines, given by (COPE) for any publication disputes, authorship disputes, etc. For these kinds of disputes, we generally visit and follow the COPE website and author(s) are also requested to follow. We maintain the standards and requirements of the “Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing”.

1. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study.

2. Authors should make sure that their work is entirely original and if the author used the content of others they need to cite that authors work.

3. Authors need to add a line of Conflicts of interest in the manuscript while submitting to a journal.

4. Authors should confirm that all experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

5. We suppose our authors to obey with, best practice in publication ethics.